Reviews that once took weeks manually are now available daily through automation.
Lead Bank’s path to secure by design: Scaling security for a fast-growing digital bank

-
H.01 -
H.02 Lead Bank grew from one reviewer to full coverage of core, access, and infrastructure projects.
-
H.03 Risks are now ranked by impact and likelihood, cutting noise and focusing the team on critical issues first.
- IndustryFinancial Services
- RegionNorth America
- Integrations
-
Intro
As a technology-first bank delivering modern, compliant infrastructure, Lead Bank has made security a foundational part of how it builds. Rather than retrofitting controls after development, the team set out to build securely from day one. Embedding best practices into every design, architecture, and requirement. With a lean security team and a growing number of product initiatives, they needed a proactive, scalable model for embedding security into every design decision. By adopting Clover’s design-led product security approach, Lead Bank now runs automated security reviews from the earliest stages, enabling developers to build securely by design, long before code is ever written.
challenges
Lean security team
With a single full-time security lead and growing demand across multiple product teams, Lead Bank needed a more scalable way to manage rising review requests and maintain consistent oversight.
Manual and inconsistent reviews
Security reviews were performed manually, slowing down development and leaving gaps in coverage and resulting in an inconsistent security standard.
Difficulty prioritizing risks
Without a consistent framework, it was hard to connect findings from pen tests, audits, and ad hoc reviews, making it unclear which risks needed attention first.
solutions
Automated security reviews
Automated design reviews were integrated directly into engineering workflows, enabling the lean security team to scale coverage without adding headcount. Reviews now run continuously against design documents, roadmaps, and infrastructure plans.
Standardized review process
A consistent set of security checks covering IAM hardening, secure data storage, and OWASP Top 10 risks was codified into every review. This eliminated variability and ensured a reliable baseline across projects.
Contextual risk prioritization
Reviews surfaced findings in ranked order of impact, correlating design issues with pen test and audit results. This gave both security and engineering teams clarity on which issues to address first.
Productivity
Building a scalable and proactive
security review process
Lead Bank’s security team faced a growing workload with limited resources. With only one engineer dedicated to product security, manual reviews created a bottleneck. Design documents often lived across Google Drive, Confluence, or even personal folders, making it difficult for security to know where risks might be hidden, and each assessment required reading lengthy documents, finding and extracting context, and drafting requirements from scratch. It was a slow process that limited how many projects the team could support.
quote
“Before Clover, security reviews were a slow, manual process. I had to read through everything, type up evidence, and it could take me a week just to get through one review, on top of all my other responsibilities. For a small security team, it became a real bottleneck. Clover completely changes that.
With Clover, reviews run automatically… It means I can focus on fixing issues instead of spending all my time searching for them.”
With Clover, design reviews are now fully automated and integrated into the team’s existing tools. Findings appear directly in Slack and Jira as new documents are created, giving engineers real-time feedback without disrupting their workflow. For the security team, it means doing more with less - reviewing more designs, surfacing more issues, and keeping pace with the business.
Consistency
Embedding security into design-led workflows
Lead Bank’s manual reviews were historically driven by past experience and personal judgment. There were no consistent rules for what should be flagged, and security checks often varied from one service to another. This made it hard to enforce standards and ensure equal scrutiny across initiatives resulting in variability in quality, delayed feedback, and missed opportunities to catch issues earlier in the design process.
quote
“Before Clover, security reviews were largely subjective and based on past experiences. Now the process is standardized, aligned with best practices, and surfaces issues I might have missed in a manual review. Clover takes the guesswork out and makes our design reviews more reliable and secure.”
With Clover, a consistent set of security checks is automatically applied to every review by integrating directly with the team’s design repositories and applying best practices like AWS Well-Architected and OWASP ASVS into every review out-of-the-box. What once took hours now takes minutes. Even legacy documentation became actionable, helping the team build a consistent backlog of risks and apply the same security lens across products from lending to real-time payments.
Prioritization
Prioritizing the risks that matter most
Without a consistent risk framework, Lead Bank’s security team often found itself triaging long lists of issues with no clear sense of priority. Developers were unsure what needed fixing first, and security lacked the data to defend decisions or accelerate reviews ahead of audits or compliance efforts.
Clover changed that by mapping findings to industry frameworks and presenting risks in ranked order of impact and likelihood. This allowed the team to conduct faster, more defensible risk assessments, prioritize confidently, and ensure the most critical issues were addressed first.
quote
“Clover gives us visibility into what’s being built and ensures our internal standards are applied consistently. It creates a solid foundation to raise the bar over time, while also giving us the compliance record we need. Now, when someone asks if we reviewed a feature before release, we can point to documented risk and threat assessments with confidence.”
Next for lead bank
Scaling product security for long-term resilience
Looking ahead, Lead Bank is focused on strengthening its product security program by expanding automated reviews across all services, improving visibility into critical applications, and aligning security standards with future regulatory needs. With consistent coverage in place and prioritized risks addressed, the team can now shift attention to embedding security into every stage of product development. By making automated reviews a standard part of the engineering workflow, Lead Bank is building a scalable, resilient security model that will support innovation and growth for years to come.


